Rajesh Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15212 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3347 Year- 2013 Thana -GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGOPALGANJ ====================================================== Rajesh Yadav S/o Sita Ram Yadav Resident of Village Sahebachak, Police Station Mirganj, District Gopalganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Anita Devi W/o Rajesh Yadav, D/o Nathuni Yadav at present R/o Village Barka Gaun, P.S. Mirganj, District Gopalganj. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 14-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Section 498(A), 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The petitioner is husband and is ready to keep his wife. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the wife is also ready to live with her husband.
Considering the willingness of the petitioner to keep his wife, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below shall, after issuing notice to the complainant, grant provisional bail to the petitioner on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15212 of 2015 (2) dt.14-05-2015 2/2 (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in Complaint Case No. 3347 of 2013, corresponding to Trial No. 4924 of 2014.
The court below shall make all efforts for reconciliation of the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved amicably between the parties, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for provisional bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T