Rishi Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9240 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -407 Year- 2016 Thana -KISHANGANJ District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== Rishi Kumar Mandal, son of Bhajan Lal Mandal, resident of VillageMehdipur, P.S.- Kochadhaman, District- Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Kishanganj P.S.Case No. 407 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation in the FIR is that death claim of the informant has been withdrawn by some persons and petitioner is the Surveyor of the Insurance Company and, as such, there is suspicion against the petitioner and he is in custody for two months. Heard learned APP also, who has stated that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and he is Surveyor of the Insurance Company.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9240 of 2017 (3) dt.18-03-2017 2/2 no specific allegation has been alleged against the petitioner and he is in custody for two months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in connection with Kishanganj P.S.Case No. 407 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U