Taslim Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10512 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2024 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Taslim Ansari Son of Late Hamid Ansari R/O Village- Dinara, Ward No. -9, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Deovind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 64, 351(2) of B.N.S. 2023.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, informant is a 22 year old married lady and she came in contact with the petitioner through mobile and both developed friendship. On regular basis they used to talk through mobile and one day petitioner called the informant at a hotel and established physical relationship with her. It is further alleged that petitioner threatened her to get marry with him otherwise, he would kill her husband. He also threatened her that he would make her objectionable photos viral at social media.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10512 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. No any photograph is available to the informant to support her claim. Statement of the victim lady/informant was recorded u/s 183 BNSS in which she has not made any allegation of rape against the petitioner. From perusal of that statement it appears that only offence of criminal intimidation is attracted against the petitioner. After completion of investigation, chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 08.09.2024.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge IX, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with ST No. 602 of 2024 arises out of Dinara P.S. Case No. 382 of 2024 with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10512 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 3/3 following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every fixed date and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bonds may be cancelled by the learned trial Court.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) sushma/- U