Saroj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18068 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -121 Year- 2017 Thana -DEHRI TOWN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Saroj Kumar, son of Late Ayodhya Prasad @ Ayodhya Seth, resident of Village- Barkagaon Charnad, P.S.- Nokha, Distt- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shankar Sahay with Mr. Navin Kumar Jha, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anita Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Dehri (T) P.S.Case No. 121 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1 b) a, 26 & 35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation as per FIR is that vehicle of the petitioner was intercepted and accused person has been arrested at the spot and one Mobile was recovered from his possession. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except one Mobile nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is in custody for about two months having clean antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18068 of 2017 (2) dt.19-04-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dehri, Rohtas, in connection with Dehri (T) P.S.Case No. 121 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U