M/S S.S. Construction v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

REQUEST CASE No.29 of 2022 ====================================================== M/s S.S. Construction, through its Proprietor Shri Shyam Kishore Rai, Male, aged about 62 years, S/o Late Jagdev Rai, R/o S.S. Villa, Balbhadrapur, Laheria Sarai, P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar through Executive Engineer, Rural Work Department, Works Division, Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dudh Nath Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay, GA 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-06-2022 This application has been moved seeking appointment of an Arbitrator invoking the powers of this Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

Petitioner and the respondents entered into a written agreement dated 11.01.2007 (Annexure-1 Page 15). The said agreement contains an arbitration clause- 25 (Page 21) for settlement of disputes. Petitioner approached Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal for invoking the said Clause and the order of the Tribunal dated 15.12.2020/19.01.2021 was returned.

Today, there is no dispute about-(a) the legality, validity and binding effect of a written agreement dated

Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.29 of 2022 dt.29-06-2022 2/3 11.01.2007 and subsequently entered into between the parties to the lis; (b) the existence of arbitration clause contained therein; (c) the existence of dispute(s) arising there from; (d) the dispute arisen out of the agreement being civil in nature; (e) no legal impediment in the adjudication of the dispute by the learned Arbitrator; (f) Petitioner having exhausted the channel available for resolution of dispute; (g) the respondents having failed to appoint an Arbitrator pursuant to the invocation of the arbitration clause by the petitioner.

As such, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh, Former Judge, Patna High Court, Mobile No. 9431015011, is appointed as learned Arbitrator to adjudicate all disputes arising out of agreement dated 11.01.2007 entered into between the parties to the lis.

All pleas and issues raised, on merits, are left open to be considered and decided by the learned Arbitrator. Learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fee as per the schedule of the Act.

Since the dispute arises out of an agreement of the year 2007, it is expected of the learned Arbitrator to decide the issues expeditiously.

Parties are directed to fully cooperate and not take

Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.29 of 2022 dt.29-06-2022 3/3 any unnecessary adjournment.

The proceedings, during the time of current Pandemic- Covid-19 shall be conducted through digital mode, unless the parties otherwise mutually agree to meet in person i.e. physical mode.

Joint Registrar (List) is directed to immediately communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator. Learned counsel for the parties to communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator. Also, parties are directed to appear before him, through physical/digital mode on 29.07.2022 and apprise him of passing of this order.

Parties shall file their statement of claims before the learned Arbitrator on such date of hearing which he may fix, as per mutual convenience.

The Request Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) Ashwini/Sujit AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 11.07.2022 Transmission Date NA