Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21227/2021bail rejected

Rajan Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-28Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21227 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2020 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAJAN SAHANI Son of Goma Sahani @ Mahengu Sahani Resident of Village - Araratola, Dharara, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kanchan Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-01-2022 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. Let the defect(s) be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course. The petitioner, who is in custody since 06.05.2020 seeks regular bail in connection with Sadar Hajipur, Vaishali, P.S. Case No. 269 of 2020, for the offence punishable under Sections 304(b), 328 and 120(b) of Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M-I, Hajipur at Vaishali. The F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioner alleging that he used to torture and finally committed murder of his wife. The deceased was blessed with two children from the wedlock have supported the allegation made in the F.I.R. against the petitioner. The petitioner used to torture the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21227 of 2021(5) dt.28-01-2022 2/2 deceased and used to demand money for consuming liquor and building house. The case was registered under Section 304(b) of the I.P.C. The Chargesheet has been submitted under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner, he referred several paragraphs of the case diary from which it it has surfaced that the petitioner will become dangerous for his two children, if he is enlarged on bail.

Considering the serious offence committed by the petitioner of murdering his wife supported by his two children, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner, above named, is rejected.

(Purnendu Singh, J) manish/- U T