← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3655/2023dismissed

Pintu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-16Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3655 of 2023 ====================================================== Pintu Sah Son of Sri Kishori Sah, Resident of Village- Nimuia, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Jogapatti (Nawalpur), District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Revenue and Revenue Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector, West Champaran at Betiiah.

3.

Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, West Champaran at Betiiah.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Betiiah, West Champaran. 5.

The Anchaladhikari, Jogapatti Anchal, West Champaran. 6.

Lalji Baitha Son of Sri Kailash Baitha, Resident of Village- Nirmuia, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Jogapatti, District- West Champaran. 7.

Jatan Baitha Son of Sri Suraj Baitha, Resident of Village- Nirmuia, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Jogapatti, District- West Champaran. 8.

Dhurrendra Baitha Son of Sri Shankar Baitha, Resident of Village- Nirmuia, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Jogapatti, District- West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Zila Parisad.

2. This application has been filed for the direction to the respondent nos. 2 to 5 to remove the encroachment made by the private respondent nos. 6 to 8 from over the vacant land of Zila Parishad, West Champaran at Bettiah.

3. Learned counsel for the State and Zila Parisad jointly submit that the encroachment has been removed. In these

Patna High Court CWJC No.3655 of 2023(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 circumstances this application has become infructuous.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 6 to 8 submits that respondent no. 6 to 8 who are the alleged encroachers have applied to the District Magistrate, West Champaan at Bettiah for grant of parcha under the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947.

5. If any application is pending before the authorities the same may be decided in accordance with law within a month of communication of this order.

6. Accordingly, this writ application stands dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Sudha/- U