Radha Devi @ Radha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12651 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2025 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Radha Devi @ Radha Kumari Wife of Ajay Sharma @ Ajay Kumar R/o Village - Lakshmipur, Singhchak, P.S. - Suryagarha, Dist. - Lakhisarai. 2.

Sadan Sharma @ Sadan Mistry @ Sadan Mitri Son of Late Kari Mistry R/o Village - Lakshmipur, Singhchak, P.S. - Suryagarha, Dist. - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 74, 3(5) and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no. 1 is a woman and the informant alleges that some dispute had arisen on 297-2025 which was compromised at police station, but on 30-7-2025 while she was going to attend nature's call, when accused persons assaulted her by lathi causing injury on head, thereafter accused persons even assaulted her sisters Poonam and Tannu causing injury on head.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12651 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026 2/2 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioners and the informant are neighbours and are having dispute relating to passage. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific rather is general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminals.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T