Suresh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1520 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2020 Thana- THAWE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== SURESH PRASAD Son of Teka Prasad Resident of Village - Gopalpur, P.S.- Thawe, District - Gopalganj, State - Bihar.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Gyan Abhinav,Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr.A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-03-2021 Let the defects be removed within four weeks. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 19.01.2021 in Thawe P.S.Case No.122 of 2020 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Gopalganj, registered under Sections 147,148,149,341,323,307,504,506/325 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(i)(r)(s)/3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Submission is that there is no allegation against the appellant for commission of any injury at the vital part of the body.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1520 of 2021(2) dt.09-03-2021 2/2 In the circumstance, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case and also the appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the learned Trial Court, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T