Arun Kumar @ Arun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14559 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2024 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Arun Kumar @ Arun Yadav Son of Rambtar Yadav @ Ramavtar Yadav Resident of Vill- Mahmadpur, P.S.- Kako, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Om Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 213 of 2024 dated 08.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2, 352, 351(2) read with section 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant was returning to his house, in the meantime, the petitioner and the co-accused persons armed with various weapons stopped the informant and the co-accused Chandan Kumar fired on the informant but the bullet misfired, thereafter, the petitioner and the other co-accused assaulted the informant with knife on his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14559 of 2025(3) dt.23-06-2025 2/3 abdomen, shoulder and his back causing severe injury and the informant fell down. It is further alleged that the co-accused Sugapati Devi snatched golden chain and Rs. 15,000/- from the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation of inflicting stab blow on the informant's abdomen is against the co-accused Kundan Kumar. As per the injury report, the injured sustained three multiple injuries and the injury no. 1 which is sustained on abdomen is grievous in nature and the injury no. 2 and 3 are simple in nature which are on non-vital part of the body. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent in which he has been acquitted as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 02.11.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14559 of 2025(3) dt.23-06-2025 3/3 concerned, Jehanabad in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 213 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T