Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13721/2017bail granted

Kailu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-23Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13721 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -127 Year- 2016 Thana -CHANDAN District- BANKA ====================================================== Kailu Yadav Son of Badri Yadav, Resident of Village-Udaipura, Police Station-Mohanpur, District-Deoghar (Jharkhand) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajib Ranjan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Chandan P.S.Case No.127 of 2016 for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner though he has criminal antecedent and in a case he has been acquitted and in another case, he is on bail. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody for about four months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13721 of 2017 (2) dt.23-03-2017 2/2 Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Kumari Saroj Kirti, J.M. Ist Class, Banka in connection with Chandan P.S.Case No.127 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U