Lalu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10206 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2019 Thana- ASHTHAWAN District- Nalanda ====================================================== Lalu Kumar, aged about 26 years, Son of Yadu Paswan @ Jadu Paswan Resident of Village - Bokana, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State through video conferencing. In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Asthawan P.S. Case No. 194 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 394, 411 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per Informant, he was going to his Sasural at Gangati, when he reached near the Railway bridge at 10 PM, three unknown persons surrounded him, assaulted and snatched away his mobile phone, handbag containing documents as also cash amounting Rs. 2,000/-.

One of the co-accused, namely, Ayush Kumar was arrested by the police who confessed the involvement of the present petitioner in the alleged crime and, at his instance, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10206 of 2020(3) dt.19-06-2020 2/2 looted motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the present petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said motorcycle was standing outside a thatched house and the same was not in possession of the petitioner but, from the C.D.R., it appears that the petitioner was in talking term with the other accused persons. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, above named, is rejected with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after one year of his judicial custody.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T