← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2998/2023disposed

M/S Sanjay Printing Works v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-21Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2998 of 2023 ====================================================== M/S Sanjay Printing Works through its Partner Nawin Chandra Jaiswal (Male), aged about 64 years, son of Late (Dr.) Mathura Prasad Jaiswal, Resident of Mohalla- Gurhatta, P.S. Khajekalan, Patna City, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Secretary, Information and Public Relations Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Information and Public Relations Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Assistant Director, Information and Public Relations Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha (GA-7) Mr. Sanghamitra Ghosh, AC to GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 21-03-2023 In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) For a direction that the petitioner will not be debarred from participation of the future tender and present tender.

(ii) For grant of any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the eye of law."

2. Prima-facie, the petitioner's grievance is premature, in

Patna High Court CWJC No.2998 of 2023 dt.21-03-2023 2/2 other words, on speculation, the petitioner has presented this petition on the presumption that his tender application is likely to be rejected with reference to earlier order of blacklisting him. It is submitted that earlier order of blacklisting is for a period of 3 years and it has already elapsed.

3. In the light of these facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is premature. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file petition as and when cause of action accrued to petitioner. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Arun Kumar Jha, J) Daya/ Himanshu/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 23.03.2023 Transmission Date NA