← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/22460/2018disposed

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-01-06The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22460 of 2018 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar, Son of Yogendra Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village - Karaiya, P.S. Adopur, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna 2.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, East Champaran at Motihari. 3.

The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari. 4.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Raxaul, East Champaran. 5.

The Circle Officer, Adapur, East Champaran.

6.

The S.H.O. Adapur, Police Station Adapur, East Champaran. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondents :

Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, GA-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 06-01-2020 The petition filed on 26.11.2018 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "For issuance of appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) for commanding the respondents concerned to same are the encroachment of Land from the Gairmajurua Aam (Road) from Railway Dala to Pasah river Chhat Ghat bearing Khata No. 226 and Keshara No. 639 under Koraiya village, Anchal Adapur, District East Champaran." After the matter was heard for some time, learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.22460 of 2018(2) dt.06-01-2020 2/2 counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) P.K.P./-Rajeev Kumar U