← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21837/2021bail granted

Ramchandra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-09Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21837 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2020 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== RAMCHANDRA YADAV Son of Sri Jagdish Prasad Resident of Village - Maura Baghala, P.S.- Shankarpur, Distt.- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Sr. Advocate :

Mr. Satyendra Prasad, Advocate :

Mr. Giridhar Gopal Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 09-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of misappropriation of government money by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has submitted his show cause just after receiving the letter no.2161 dated 03.10.2019 to the District Education Officer on 17.10.2019 and in the said show cause, the petitioner has denied the defalcation of money. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21837 of 2021(3) dt.09-03-2022 2/2 further submits that existence of five banks accounts of school are not only wrong statement but the amount in the accounts of school fund is also wrong and exaggerated and the petitioner has clearly given the account of the fund and the money spent on various heads and the account for in the ledger register of the school. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 393 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T