Rubina Parween v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18993 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Siwan ====================================================== Rubina Parween W/O Gulam Ashraf @ Raunak Resident of Village- Millat Colony, Near Masjid P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand), at present residing with her father Afroj Alam, resident of Village- Ukhai Purab Partti Hatta, Pubareipatti, P.S.- Sarai, O.P. District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Abdul Kalam Azad S/O Late Abdul Manan Ahmad Resident Of VillageMillat Colony, Near Masjid, P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). 3.

Nafisa Bano W/O Abdul Kalam Azad Resident Of Village- Millat Colony, Near Masjid, P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). 4.

Sajia Parveen @ Kahkashan Parveen D/O Abdul Kalam Azad Resident Of Village- Millat Colony, Near Masjid, P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand).

5.

Abdul Bari @ Tullu S/O Late Abdul Mannan Resident Of Village- Millat Colony, Near Masjid, P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). 6.

Abdul Khalid @ Bobby @ Boddy S/O Late Abdul Mannan Ahmad Resident Of Village- Millat Colony, Near Masjid, P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand).

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramadhar Shekhar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the O.P. Nos. 2 to 6 vide order dated 12.01.2022 & 18.11.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions JudgeVIth, Siwan in A.B.P. Nos. 704 of 2021 & 1624 of 2021.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 18993 of 2023(3) dt.24-07-2026 2/2

3. Perused the records.

4. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the materials available on record, this Court finds that no supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show that O.P. Nos. 2 to 6 have misused the privilege of bail or violated any of the conditions imposed by the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.

5. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.

6. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of this order. The learned Trial Court shall submit a compliance report before this Court after expiry of the said period.

7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Siwan through FAX or e-mail for immediate compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) sadique/- U T