← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11353/2026bail granted

Jitendra Gond v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-23Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11353 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-327 Year-2025 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== Jitendra Gond S/o Achhelal Gond R/o vill - Tadava Parasiyaa, P.S.- Darauli, Distt.- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Darauli P.S Case No. 327 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 324(4), 126(2), 352, 109, 351(3), 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with co-accused have assaulted the informant and his wife.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that co-accused Basudeo Gond and Achhelal Gond have been granted bail by the trial Court but on similar footing petitioner bail application is rejected only on the basis that he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11353 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/3 failed to disclose his criminal antecedent of two case of excise act. It is further submitted that petitioner undertakes that in future he will be vigilant in mentioning his criminal antecedent and he seeks unconditional apology for his conduct.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. From perusal of the F.I.R., impugned order and materials available on record it appears that co-accused Basudeo Gond and Achhelal Gond have been granted bail by the trial Court but on similar footing petitioner bail application is rejected only on the basis that he failed to disclose his criminal antecedent of two case of excise act. Petitioner is hereby directed that in future he will be vigilant in mentioning his criminal antecedent.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the trial court within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM-I, Siwan in connection with Darauli P.S Case No. 327 of 2025 subject to the condition laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11353 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T