Sujeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17306 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2014 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sujeet Singh S/o Ram Chandra Singh R/o village- Sondih, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 01-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No.133/2014 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 337, 353, 427, 504 and 124A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and nothing specifically has been alleged against this petitioner. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17306 of 2020(3) dt.01-09-2020 2/2 wherein this petitioner is said to be a member of the mob who had allegedly surrounded the police station in question, although there is no allegation that any injury has been caused to any person but the kind of occurrence alleged in the First Information Report wherein a large number of persons was said to have been a background of terrorist outfit had attempted to surround the police station and do the harm and the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail now after six years, the case being that of the year 2014, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In case the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail in the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, his prayer for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order of this Court. The application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.