← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16058/2017allowed

Ram Ayodhya Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16058 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2004 Thana -SUGAULI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Ram Ayodhya Sahani Son of Mangal Sahani, Resident of Village- Bahuari, P.S.- Mufasil Motihari (Lakhaura) District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 23.1.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 49728 of 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that both the victim Sanjay Kumar Pandit and informant were examined in this case but they have not identified the accused persons before the court.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16058 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2017 2/2 Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 7th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1048 of 2016 arising out of Sugauli P.S. Case no. 19 of 2004 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T