Ajim Ansari @ China v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12925 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2017 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ajim Ansari @ China, aged about 40 years, Male, Son of Md. Sadique resident of Village-Basha, P.S.-Babu Barahi, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha, Adv.

Ms. Raj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Babu Barahi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2017 registered for offences under sections 341, 323, 354(B), 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, as per allegation made in the First Information Report, the petitioner has misbehaved with the Informant.

This Court had called for the case diary. From perusal of the case diary, it appears that the independent witnesses have said that a false case has been lodged by the Informant against the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12925 of 2019(3) dt.28-03-2019 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Madhubani in connection with Babu Barhi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T