Jitendra Ram @ Jitan Ram @ Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12515 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2022 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Jitendra Ram @ Jitan Ram @ Jitendra Kumar S/O Banti Ram Resident Of Village- Gulab Patti Parsauni, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Shila Devi W/O Jitendra Ram @ Jitan Ram @ Jitendra Ram Resident Of Village- Gulab Patti Parsauni, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. 3.

Rahul Kumar S/O Jitendra Ram @ Jitan Ram @ Jitendra Kumar Resident Of Village- Gulab Patti Parsauni, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. 4.

Jiyalal Ram S/O Banti Ram Resident Of Village- Gulab Patti Parsauni, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhubala Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners along with other co-accused person are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 happens to be father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law and cousin father-in-law of the deceased. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that the husband of the deceased is already in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12515 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 judicial custody. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 285 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

However, learned court below shall accept the bail bond of the petitioners after verifying the fact that the husband of the deceased is in judicial custody.

devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T