Prahalad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5731 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2015 Thana -MARANCHI District- PATNA ====================================================== Prahalad Kumar, Son of Dinesh Kewat, Resident of Village- Neema Pandey, P.S. Halsi, District Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-02-2016 Heard Sri Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel, who has voluntarily appeared on behalf of the informant.

The sole petitioner, apprehending his arrest in connection with Marachi P.S. Case no.113/15 registered for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the petitioner has been arrayed as one of the accused in the F.I.R., no specific accusation has been made against the petitioner, save and except the petitioner along with three other accused persons had arrived at the place of occurrence and among

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5731 of 2016 (2) dt.19-02-2016 2/2 them, one fired on the cousin of the informant and, as such, on the aforesaid ground, he has made a prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have also perused the F.I.R. In view of nature of accusation, I do not find any ground for extending the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U