← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10549/2020bail granted

Nitesh Kumar Singh @ Nitesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2020-11-04Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10549 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2019 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== NITESH KUMAR SINGH @ NITESH SINGH, aged about 21 years (Male), S/o Parmanand Singh, R/o village- Raisingha, P.S.- Motihari Muffasil, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-11-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through Virtual Court Proceeding. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 305 of 2019, registered for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation has been made that accused persons including this petitioner have intercepted the informant and demanded money, on refusal, they assaulted the informant and snatched Rs.66,720/-.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has two criminal antecedents but, in the present case, he is in jail since 14.10.2019. Looking to the period of custody, let the petitioner,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10549 of 2020(5) dt.04-11-2020 2/2 above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran, in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 305 of 2019, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. mother/father/brother/wife (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In the event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order including cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T