Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15111/2017bail granted

Ajit Yadav @ Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-26Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15111 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15111 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2004 Thana -NAYAGAON District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Ajit Yadav @ Chandan Yadav, Son of Naresh Yadav, Resident of VillageDariyapur, P.S. Nayagaon, District Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 34 of 2004, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 326, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail for about more than eight years.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 06.01.2017 and the charge has already been framed against the petitioner on 23.01.2017. It is further submitted that the petitioner under takes that he will appear on each and every date in the trial court in future.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15111 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017 Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Begusarai, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 537A of 2004, arising out of Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 34 of 2004. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause being shown, the trial court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T