Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14365 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1150 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.
Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar S/o- Guru Prasad Yadav Resident Of VillageKoniyapar Ps- Nawada District- Nawada 2.
Guru Prasad Yadav S/o- Late Musafir Yadav Resident Of Village-Koniyapar Ps- Nawada District- Nawada 3.
Geeta Devi @ Batashwa Devi @ Rita Devi @ Batasha Devi W/o- Guru Prasad Yadav Resident Of Village-Koniyapar Ps- Nawada District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 29-04-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application of petitioner no. 1, Manoj Yadav and further undertakes to surrender in next four weeks.
2. The anticipatory bail application of petitioner no. 1, Manoj Yadav is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, learned Counsel for the petitioners, State as also Ms. Rima Sahay and Ms. Pallavi Kumar for the informant.
4. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 1150 of 2025 for the offence
2/4 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 74, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS and 3⁄4 of the Dayan Act.
5. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that the accused persons came armed variously and after abuse, on the order of the petitioner no. 2, Manoj Yadav assaulted by iron rod to the son of the informant, Santosh Kumar on the head. The allegation of assault is also on Shankar Yadav and Guru Yadav besides Gita Devi of pelting bricks. The outraging of modesty of the daughter of the informant is also there. This led to the FIR.
6. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submit that the entire family members have been roped in which include the sons and the parents. With the help of the injury report, the submission is that despite advice, the injured left the hospital without any information to the Doctor which has been recorded.
7. The informant is appearing and the learned counsels jointly submit that role of assault is against everyone including the petitioners herein.
8. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also the fact that there is no opinion regarding the nature of the injury as the injured left the place as recorded by the Medical Officer, one of the petitioner is a lady, an undertaking
3/4 has been given that they shall be diligently appearing in trial, in that background, this Court is inclined to grant them the anticipatory bail with conditions.
9. Let the petitioners in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 1150 of 2025 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(i) one of the bailor should be the family members/relatives of the petitioners, who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card, PAN Card, Driving License, Voter ID) to show his bona fide;
(ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial court itself;
(iii) the petitioners shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark attendance and at the end of the period, the certificate be
4/4 submitted to the Court;
(iv) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(v) the petitioners shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.
10. Before parting, this Court would like to put on record its word of appreciation for Ms. Rima Sahay and Ms. Pallavi Kumari for proper assistance rendered in the matter. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U