Sanoj Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21734 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2020 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran ====================================================== SANOJ RAI Son of Naresh Rai Resident of Village - Nawal Tola, P.S. Dighwara, District - saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Shruti Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 238 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 376, 511, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to land dispute. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that petitioner is named in the first information report. There is allegation against the petitioner of threatening the informant and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21734 of 2021(5) dt.07-04-2022 2/2 tried to attempt rape of her but he has not succeeded in committing rape, then he took away forty thousand cash and some ornaments. Hence, petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the opposite party, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. utkarsh/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T