Dhananjay Pratap Verma @ Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16439 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -430 Year- 2016 Thana -BAGHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Dhananjay Pratap Verma @ Srivastava son of Late Jagdish Chandra Verma resident of village - Subash Nagar (Rampur), P.S. - Lokariya, District - West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bagaha (Pathkhauli) P.S. Case No. 430 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 466, 474 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner gave forged surrender slip to Lalbabu Yadav against whom warrant of arrest was issued. Lalbabu Yadav identified the petitioner and said that he had taken Rs. 1200/- for the same and thereafter on the basis of F.I.R. of Santu Kumar Sah, the office clerk of A.D.J.III, Bagha this case has been registered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is not the clerk in civil court, he has got no concern with Lalbabu Yadav, he has falsely implicated the petitioner resulting

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16439 of 2017 (3) dt.28-04-2017 2/2 petitioner is suffering in custody since 15.11.2016. Chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and, as such he deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and, as such, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Bagaha in connection with Bagaha (Pathkhauli) P.S. Case No.

430 of 2016 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T