Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7220/2017bail granted

Arun Rai @ Arun Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-27Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7220 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -385 Year- 2014 Thana -BAGHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Arun Rai @ Arun Singh, Son of Late Bhuneshwar Rai, Resident of Village- Babangawa, P.S.- Sarath, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kr Singh No. 1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Asharaf Ansari (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 385 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner fled away with amount of Rs. 3,06,500/- which was given by Bhulan Singh. Submission is of false implication and that the informant is not an eye-witness, as stated during statement of Bhulan Singh, petitioner has been made accused resulting, he is suffering in custody since 08.12.2016, chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and, as such, the petitioner deserves

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7220 of 2017 (3) dt.27-04-2017 2/2 sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and, as such, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Bagaha, District West Champaran, in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 385 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T