Amarjeet Singh @ Amar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17148 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2015 Thana -CHANDRADEEP District- JAMUI ====================================================== Amarjeet Singh @ Amar Singh, son of Mukesh Singh, resident of VillageSonkhar, P.S.- Chandradeep, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar with Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Gulnar Begam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Chandradeep P.S.Case No. 60 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Section 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and allegation is under Section 386/34 IPC.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except name of the petitioner transpires in the confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against him. It has further been submitted that though petitioner has been made accused in other cases also but he is on bail on those cases and in this case he is in custody since 17.8.2016.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17148 of 2017 (2) dt.13-04-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Nagendra Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui, in connection with Chandradeep P.S.Case No. 60 of 2015, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U