Rohit Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11714 of 2015 (3) dt.21-05-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11714 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -284 Year- 2014 Thana -JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictJEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Rohit Kumar S/o Pradip Prasad Resident of Mohalla Thakurwari Dhivara Par, Behind Gaytri Mandir, Jehanabad, Police Station and District Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Smt. Anshu Kumari @ Priti Kumari D/o Shailendra Sinha @ Surendra Prasad Resident of Mohalla Thakurbari, Dibara Par, behind Gayatri Mandir, Police Station Jehanabad, District Jehanabd. At present Mohalla Gaorashhani Devi Asthan, Police Station Jehanabad, District jehanabad. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madan Jeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Khurshid Anwar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03/ 21.05.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and also heard learned counsel for the complainant.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he solemnized his marriage with opposite party no.2 in a temple but later on, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by the petitioner and other family members due to non-fulfillment of illegal demand. The contention on behalf of the petitioner is that complainant is not legally wedded wife of the petitioner and, as a matter of fact, when petitioner completed his study, opposite party no.2 pressurized him to solemnize his marriage with her which was denied by him resulting institution of the present case.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11714 of 2015 (3) dt.21-05-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention towards annexures 6, 7 etc to the petition.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest/ surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the concerned court, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in Complaint case no. 284/2014 subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T