Ajay Bind @ Ajay Kumar Bind @ Dr. Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21557 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2019 Thana- BHABHUA DistrictKaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== AJAY BIND @ AJAY KUMAR BIND @ DR. AJAY KUMAR, aged about 34 years (M), son of Sri Ram Shankar Bind, resident of Village - Atariya Kalyanpur, P.S.- Durgawati, District- Kaimur, at present residing at Ward No. 11, At & P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sinha No.1, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant through video conference. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking that all defects pointed out by the stamp reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately upon resumption of normal physical functioning of the Court, and in any event within one month thereof.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 09.05.2019, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Bhabhua P.S. Case No. 250 of 2019, having earlier been rejected twice by order dated 20.11.2019 passed in Criminal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21557 of 2021(2) dt.04-08-2021 2/2 Miscellaneous No. 43007 of 2019 and order dated 09.09.2020 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.17072 of 2020 for the offence alleged under Section 326-A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that trial is ongoing and is at the stage of argument by the defence.

4. Learned APP assisted by learned counsel for the informant appear and have been heard.

5. Having regard to the stage of trial, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner at this stage. The petition is dismissed with the observation that trial court may conclude the trial expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from today.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) pawan/- U T