Sandeep Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11247 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-454 Year-2018 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar Singh, Male, aged 20 Years, Son of Sunar Singh @ Ramsundar Singh, Resident of Village-Naini (Vaishtolla), P.S-Chapra Muffasil, Dist.-Saran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. N.N. Tiwari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 307/34 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 13.10.2018 around 4.30 P.M. when the informant was going to Mahavir Mandir, the accused persons on the way, intercepted and started hurling abuses and on protest they started assaulting him with Lathi, Danda and rod during which co-accused Abhay alias Bhanu Singh caused injury with knife on right side of his forehead. Petitioner Sandeep Kumar Singh and co-accused Rauki Singh took him to their Mohalla by putting rope around his neck. On information, his family members reached there. Co-accused Sheodani Singh snatched gold chain from his neck.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11247 of 2019(2) dt.25-02-2019 2/2 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Nature of injury is said to be simple. No offence under Section 307 of the IPC is made out. Rests of the offences are triable by the Magistrate.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Chapra, in connection with Chapra Muffassil P.S. Case No. 454 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T