Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12981 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -369 Year- 2016 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Pappu Kumar son of Mahindra Manjhi R/o Village - Baligarah, P.S. - Runnisaidpur, District - Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Rlunnisaidpur P.S.case No.369 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 366A, 363 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the petitioner, there was love affair between the victim girl and the petitioner and the statement of the victim girl has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein she has stated that she herself went with the petitioner as she has love affair with the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody for about four months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail, stating that the girl was miner at that time. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12981 of 2017 (3) dt.28-03-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, and also considering the statement of the victim girl made under Section 164 Cr.P.C., let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sitamarhi in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S.Case No.369 of 2016 With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T