Indrajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13892 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -144 Year- 2015 Thana -SITAMARHI District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Indrajeet Kumar, Son of Lakshman Mahto, Resident of Village- Lakshmi Nagar, P.S. Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Sufiyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Sessions Trial No.278 of 2015 arising out of Sitamarhi P.S.Case No.144 of 2015 for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been arrested on the basis of suspicion. He is in custody since 02.08.2016 except that there is nothing against the petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who could not controvert the above fact.
Having heard both sides and in view of above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand)
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13892 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi in connection with Sessions Trial No.278 of 2015 arising out of Sitamarhi P.S.Case No.144 of 2015 dated 17.02.2015.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U