Amrendra Kumar @ Amrendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24009 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2020 Thana- BANSHI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== AMRENDRA KUMAR @ AMRENDRA SINGH SON OF LATE BALIRAM SHARMA (THE THEN PANCHAYAT SECRETARY IN THE YEAR 2014) R/O VILLAGE- BHARTHU, P.S.- GHOSHI, DIST.- JAHANABAD ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he being a Panchayat Secretary had committed forgery in appointment of teacher Vijendra Kumar and prepared some anomalies in his folder with collusion of former Block Education Officer.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24009 of 2021(7) dt.29-06-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case by higher officers of the department. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not prepared forged and fabricated document regarding appointment of Vijendra Kumar. The petitioner was entrusted with the task of making only medha suchi. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Banshi, P.S. Case No. 31 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T