Ajay Kumar Thakur And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3242 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Ajay Kumar Thakur and Ors Son of Ramavatar Thakur Resident of MohallaRambagh, P.s Mithanpura, town and District Muzaffapur. 2.

Md. Khusru Perwez Raza Son of Md. Matinuddin Resident of Village and PO Kab, Via Bikram P.s Rani Talab, District Patna. 3.

Umesh Singh Son of late Madho Singh Resident of Village Baijnathpur@Khanpur, Po Mirzapur , P.s Ahiyapur, via Bochahan District Muzaffapur.

4.

Subodh kumar Sahay Son of late Lakshman Kishan Sahay Resident of Village Shivpuri Damuchak Lane No.02, P.O H.P.O. Muzaffapur, P.s Kazi Mohammadpur District Muzaffapur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department , Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department , Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The President of Bihar Rural Development Society Rural Development Department , Govt of Bihar, Patn 6.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffapur.

7.

The Deputy Development Commissioner Muzaffapur. 8.

Bihar Staff Selection Commission , Bihar, Patna. 9.

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Commission, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Suresh Rai, Sr. Advocate Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate Mr. Md. Hussamuddin Azad. Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC 4 Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC 4 For the B.S.S.C :

Dr. Ratan Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 18-04-2019 The writ petition has been filed placing reliance on some file notings recording a proceeding dated 24.12.2014. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that they

Patna High Court CWJC No.3242 of 2016 dt.18-04-2019 2/2 would be approaching the respondents no. 2 and 3 for raising their grievance.

In view of the said submissions, writ petition is disposed off. Petitioners would be at liberty to avail the departmental remedies.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Prakash/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date