Komal Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3725 of 2019 ====================================================== Komal Ram S/o Jhuri Ram Village-Bhelama,P.O. Auryo Bhelma,Awaroinya Kudra Kaimur (Bhgabua) Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar 2.

The Home Secretary, Home(Police) Dept. Bihar,Patna 3.

The D.G. cum I.G. of Police Bihar,Patna 4.

The Zonal I.G. Patna Zone, Patna 5.

The D.I.G. of Police, Magadh Range,Gaya 6.

The D.I.G. of Police Sahabad Range Dehri on Sone 7.

The S.P., Rohtas ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad, Advocate.

Ms. Maruti Kumari, Advocate.

For the Respondents :

Mr. P.K.Verma (AAG-3) Ms. Divya Verma, AC to AAG-3.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 27-02-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner who is an Inspector of Police seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to grant him the benefits of the first and second ACP as well as the MACP and other financial benefits to which he is entitled.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that persons junior to him have been accorded the aforesaid benefit but the same has been withheld from the petitioner without any apparent reason. The

Patna High Court CWJC No.3725 of 2019 dt.27-02-2019 2/2 representation of the petitioner in the past before the concerned authorities have yielded no result till date.

4. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is directed to make a detailed representation before the D.G.-cum-I.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna (respondent no. 3) detailing his grievances and the reasons why he should not be paid the financial progression to which he is entitled within a period of four weeks from today. On receipt of such representation, the same shall be disposed of by the concerned respondent within a further period of six weeks by a reasoned order. In case the claim of the petitioner is found to be tenable, necessary sequel order shall be passed within the aforesaid period.

5. With the aforesaid direction/observation, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.02.2019 Transmission Date