← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15329/2016disposed

Balram Kumar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-11-26Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15329 of 2016 ====================================================== Balram Kumar Sahni S/o Harendra Prasad Sahni Resident of village + P.O. Chak Sikandar Via Madhopur Digharua, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Additional Secretary, General Administration, Department Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner - Cum - Chief Executive officer, District Board, Samastipur

5. The District Programme officer ( Establishment ), Samastipur

6. The Secretary/Chairman, District Board Secondary Teachers Employment Unit, Samastipur .. Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocate and Mr Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Abhanjali, AC to GA 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 26-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed a representation dated 09.08.2016 (annexure 8 of the writ petition) to the Secretary/Chairman, District Board Secondary Teachers Employment Unit, Samastipur (respondent no.6) claiming validity of his matriculation certificate from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar. It is submitted that a direction may be given so that the representation may be disposed of.

In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for

Patna High Court CWJC No.15329 of 2016(2) dt.26-11-2018 2/2 the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of. This Court would expect that respondent no.6 should take a final decision on the petitioner's representation and dispose of the same expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi U