Sumitra Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.75 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22637 of 2013 ====================================================== Sumitra Kumari, wife of Ram Ayodhya Prasad, resident of Village: Rakashiya, P.S Dulhin Bazar, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Collector of the District- Patna.

4. The Block Development Officer, Dulhin Bazar, Patna.

5. The District Education Superintendent, Patna.

6. The Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj, Achhua Rakashiya, under BockDulhin Bazar, District- Patna.

7. The Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat Raj, Achhua Rakashiya, under Block- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna.

8. The District Teacher Empolyment Appellate Authority, Patna.

9. Sangita Kumari, daughter of Late Ganpat Singh, resident of Village: Rakashiya, P.S Dulhin Bazar, District Patna, presently posted as Panchayat Teacher, in Primary School, Rakashiya Musahari, within Dulhin Bazar Block in Patna District.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Nityanand, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. K.K.Jha, AAG-14 Mr. Amish Jha, AC to AAG-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 01-03-2017 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

The review application is dismissed because what the petitioner is trying to urge is not to point out any legal or factual inaccuracy in the order but to innovate and reargue the application as a desperate measure to overcome the adjudication already made on the earlier round of application.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.75 of 2016 (2) dt.01-03-2017 2/2 The civil review application is dismissed being devoid of merit.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Pawan/- U