← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3832/2015disposed

Onkar Nath Ojha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-07-06Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3832 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Onkar Nath Ojha Son of Akhleshwar Ojha, Resident of Village and P.O. Ankuri, P.S. Paliganj, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Secretary Human Resources Department.

2. The Special Director Secondary Education, Patna.

3. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board through its Chairman, Bihar Sanakrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

4. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

5. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

6. The District Education Officer, Patna.

7. Managing Committee, Sri Kamla Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Madhya Vidyalya, Ankuri, Patna through its Secretary namely Sri Akhileshwar Ojha. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr K.K.Tiwary Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha No.-2 For the State : Mr. GP32-Harish Kumar For BSSB : Mr S.S.Sundaram =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-07-2015 There is still statutory appeal provided to the petitioner under Section 24 of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board against the order of the Chairman as contained in Annexure- 19. From a reading of the order under challenge it is evident that the petitioner did not produce any of the documents in support of his claim. Why it was not done, it is for the petitioner to explain. Bringing certain materials on record in the writ application may not suffice. Those documents and authenticity thereof will have to be examined by the authorities, who are will versed with such issues. Petitioner still has a forum and

Patna High Court CWJC No.3832 of 2015 dt.06-07-2015 2/2 opportunity to overcome the decision of the Chairman. This Court expresses no opinion on the merit nor will interfere with the order of the Chairman at this stage.

Writ is disposed of with the above liberty.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U