Madheshwar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4735 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Madheshwar Prasad Singh Son of Nageshwar Singh R/o Village - Narayanpur - Pattishital, Kharika, Police Station - Derni, Distt. - Chapra (Saran), Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Dept of Mines & Geology, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Teh Chairman, Bihar Pollution Control Board, Beltron Bhawan, Shastri Nagar, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna.

4. The Member Secretary, Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Beltron Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Shastrinagar, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Chapra at Saran

6. The General Manager, District Industry Centre, Chapra, Distt. Saran

7. The Divisional Forest Officer, Department of Forest & Environment chapra, Distt. - Saran.

8. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sonpur, Distt. - Saran.

9. The Block Development Officer, Dariapur Block, P.S. - Derni, Distt. - Saran.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kripa Nand Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay, GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 22-02-2016 Heard Mr. Kripa Nath Jha, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General-12, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Heard also Mr. Shivendra Kishore, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of Bihar Pollution Control Board.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4735 of 2015 (3) dt.22-02-2016 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) Mkr./- U