Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6744/2017bail granted

Munna Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6744 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2011 Thana -SHIVSAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Munna Ram Son of Faujdar Ram @ Faudar Ram Resident of VillageKewtadhi , P.S.- Shivsagar (Baddi), District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jayprakash Singh Mr. Arti Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Shivsagar (Baddi) P.S. Case No. 90 of 2011, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 448, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that this is a case of misuse of privilege of bail for two years and nine months, however the petitioner has remained in judicial custody since 18.11.2016 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that though this is a case of misuse of privilege of bail, however the petitioner remained in judicial custody for about three months, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6744 of 2017 (3) dt.16-02-2017 2/2 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Fast Track Court No. IV, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Shivsagar (Baddi) P.S. Case No. 90 of 2011, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on any date without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T