Sonalal Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16441 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-674 Year-2022 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sonalal Singh Son of Bhikhari Singh R/o- Bisarahiya, P.S. Dhaka, DistrictEast Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs. Prerna Rishi, Advocate Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 325, 327, 380, 385, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. All the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner in furtherance of their common intention armed with deadly weapons are said to have assaulted the informant and his family members with intention to kill them due to which they sustained injuries. They also looted away cash and other articles.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16441 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/2 the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that the instant case has been lodged only to ventilate civil dispute with respect to cow shed in question for which T.S. No. 142 of 2022 has been lodged by Deopati Devi, wife of co-accused, Upendra Singh, which is pending before the Sub-Judge-III, Sikarhana, East Champaran. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that there is admitted land dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 674 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T