Amrendra Yadav @ Daroga v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19229 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2016 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Amrendra Yadav @ Daroga Son of Late Jay Prakash Yadav R/o Village - Sahugrah, Diwani Tola, P.S. + District - Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner inflicted three knife blows to the informant from behind in front of the veranda of Sub-judge-III, Madhepura while informant has come to the court on 21.12.2015 to appear on the date resulting, he became un-conscious and fell down and then he re-gain sense and found himself admitted in the hospital and further found that an amount of Rs. 8,000/- kept in the pocket, was missing. The occurrence has taken place due to non-payment of ransom amount of Rs. 50,000/- which was demanded by the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19229 of 2017 (2) dt.17-05-2017 2/2 Submission is of false implication and that the doctor has found injury simple in nature. There was no intention to commit murder, there was no intervening circumstance. Only one injury has been found on the person of the informant. The informant has wrongly alleged that three knife blows were inflicted. The petitioner is in custody since 19.01.2017 and, as such, now he deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No.

02 of 2016 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.