Md. Akram @ Noor Mohammad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20718 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictKISANGANJ ======================================================
1. Md. Akram @ Noor Mohammad Son of Late Shafique Resident of Line Maszid, Malaria Office, P.S. & District- Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Utsav Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2017 in connection with Case No. C1-02/2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(k) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Allegation is of recovery of 3.6 litres of country made liquor from the motorcycle of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. Moreover, there is allegation of recovery of only 3.6 litres of country made liquor, for which petitioner has sufficiently been punished as he has remained in judicial custody for more than one and half months and has no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20718 of 2017 (2) dt.09-05-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, quantity of liquor recovered and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for one and half months, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge cum-Special Judge (Excise) Kishanganj, in connection with Case No. C1-02/2017.
It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T