Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17602/2017rejected

Ram Chandra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17602 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17602 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2014 Thana -TARABARI District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Ram Chandra Singh S/o Khushi Lal Singh, R/o Kajurbarj, P.S. Kunsa Kanta, District - Araria .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajkumar Rajesh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Bachan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier twice rejected vide order dated 02.03.2016 and 07.09.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 57840 of 2015 and 36417 of 2016 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 19.10.2015, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and due to the reason that he is the owner of said Bajaj Discover motorcycle from where 40 Kg. Ganja was recovered the petitioner is suffering in custody. As a matter of fact the said motorcycle was being used by the relative of the petitioner and the petitioner has been made victim of circumstances. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by pointing out the alleged recovery.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17602 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017 good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, again his prayer for bail stands rejected. However, learned trial court is again directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after taking the same on priority basis, failing which, the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T