Vikash Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18172 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2017 Thana -ARA NAWADA District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Singh, son of Arvind Singh, resident of Village Uga Kharaicha, Police Station Chauri, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Ara Nawada P.S.Case No. 59 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(B) of the Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

Allegation as per FIR is that huge quantity of liquor has been recovered from Alto Car.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has clean antecedent working as Liner and nothing has been recovered from his possession and he is in custody since 28.2.2017.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18172 of 2017 (2) dt.21-04-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Ara Nawada P.S.Case No. 59 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U