← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22476/2021bail granted

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-17Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22476 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2020 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Singh Son of Indradeo Singh Resident of Ward No. 3, Rampur-Dumra, P.S.- Maranchi, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ansul, Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Ram Naresh Rai, APP For the Informant ;

Mr. Shravan Kumarn, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-01-2022 The matter is being heard through video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of Covid-19 pandemic.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State including learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No.159 of 2020 registered for offences under Sections 302, 307 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The present FIR has been registered on the written statement of father of the deceased in which the petitioner and three others are named including one Ramjivan who has been injured in the case. On the fardbeyan of Ramjivan, another FIR

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22476 of 2021(3) dt.17-01-2022 2/2 has been registered in Mokama Police Station, Ramjivan has been examined and his statement has been recorded in paragraph 45 of the case diary in which he has named a different Mukesh Kumar alias Mukesh Singh as one of the assailants. The informant of the present case is not an eye-witness of the occurrence whereas Ramjivan is an eye-witness and injured witness.

Considering the the aforesaid, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

Accordingly, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No.159 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U T