Indradeo Singh Seva Sansthan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3592 of 2015 ====================================================== Indradeo Singh Seva Sansthan, Lilawati Niwas, Praduman Shah Ka Hata, Ramgarhia More, P.S.- Town, District- Bhojpur, Ara through its Secretary Rajgaurav son of Chaturbhuj Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Lilawati NIwas, Praduman Shah Ka Hata, Ramgarhia More, P.S.- Town, District- Bhojpur, Ara .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Buxar.

3. The District Health Society, Buxar through Civil Surgeon-cum-Member Secretary, District Health Society, Buxar.

4. The Civil Surgeon-Cum-Member Secretary, District Health Society, Buxar.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : M/s. Naresh Chandra Verma and Ram Kumar Singh, Advocates For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar, A.C. to S.C.17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 23-03-2015 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to issue work order to the petitioner pursuant to the advertisement dated 02.10.2014 which is a notice inviting tender and in response to which the petitioner had participated and was declared successful bidder for three years contract for up keep, supply of food, washing of clothes and power supply through generator in the campus of Sadar Hospital, district of Buxar.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3592 of 2015 (2) dt.23-03-2015 2/2 It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in place of issuing fresh order, the authority concerned is taking work from the previous Contractor. It is submitted that the petitioner has approached the respondent no.2, i.e., the District Magistrate, Buxar who happens to be the Chairman of the District Health Committee, Buxar by filing a representation dated 19.12.2014 which was duly received in the office.

Having regard to the aforementioned facts and circumstances, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to take a decision upon the representation of the petitioner contained in Annexure-3 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) N.H./- U