Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13732 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -119 Year- 2016 Thana -KHAJAULI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Yadav Son of Ram Sundar Biraji @ Ram Sundar Yadav, Resident of Village-Kuadh, P.S.-Jai Nagar, District-madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Panchanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Khajauli P.S.Case No.119 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner. He is in custody since 04.08.2016 and he has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of submission as above, as well as not controverted by the learned A.P.P. and also considering the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13732 of 2017 (2) dt.23-03-2017 2/2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of Khajauli P.S.Case No.119 of 2016 in connection with Sri Vivek Vishal, J.M. Ist Class, Madhubani.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U